WORKING TO PROTECT NATURAL
RESOURCES IN THE BOUNDARY
Immediate Issue
The Kettle River, despite:
S
designation as an Endangered River in 2006, and now again in 2008 see full report
S record low flows in
2006 and 2007 (according to records kept for over 70 years)
S increasing stream temperatures affecting fish &
aquatic organisms
S Water Branch's knowledge that the low flows could have been substantally worse
if all licence holders had withdrawn authorized amounts
Big White Ski Hill has applied for water licence withdrawals
and storage dam permits on several headwater streams feeding the Kettle, which would see their existing licences increase by perhaps
228%.
Water Branch has advised (while at the time not in receipt of the full application) that they believe the withdrawals will have
an insignificant or minor effect on the Kettle. Other experts in Water Resource Planning have observed that too frequently, natural
resources are destroyed by seemingly insignificant increments.
We will be seeking detailed information on the applications re
concerns:
S That withdrawals, even at time of freshet, will have negative downstream effects
S That dam volumes, according to
stated application amounts, are not static, and that usage
could exceed stated volumes.
S That
a variety of studies indicate that we are in a warming trend, that so called "climate-
change" could
increase that trend, and studies have indicated that these trends drive a
local need forearlier and greater agricultural irrigation demands primarily due to
increased evaporation and transpiration.
S That the Kettle is effectively already oversubscribed
S That the lack of regulation or control
over groundwater withdrawals will further impact
the Kettle
We Propose That:
S No licences be issued to Big White for additional water for expanded growth, snowmaking,
golf course irrigation unless Water Branch can demonstate to the community that there
will be no downstream effects.
S That no further licenced withdrawals on the Kettle be approved without a Watershed
Management Plan.
S That until a Watershed Management Plan is in place the Kettle be deemed to be
fully subscribed.
S That interested parties, NGO's, stakeholders get together immediately to begin a
process for a Watershed Management Plan for the Kettle.
We will work to advance this issue.
S That the Provincial Government
bring in groundwater legislation/controls. B.C. remains the
only Province without groundwater
legislation/controls. This is still the case despite numerous
Hearings, Inquiries and Processes
that have recommended such action, dating back to and
probably prior to 1990 when
B.C was even then the only Province without legislation.
Download
free
ADOBE
pdf file
reader
please cut/paste or add your additional comment to the letter.
If you prefer to add your names to our letter, email your name
and address to
Mar 2008
the first in a series of articles examining cattle range use in our sensitive
dryland area, and the consequences to water quality, riparian zones, sensitive grasslands and habitat.